Delegate Kathleen Dumais

Democrat, Maryland House of Delegates District 15

Response to Post Editorial – Maryland’s Shrinking Assault Weapons Ban

It is unfortunate that the recent Washington Post Editorial (3/22/13) focused on only one aspect of the important gun safety legislation currently pending before the Maryland General Assembly this session.

Here’s the “rest of the story.” In the House of Delegates, the Governor’s bill is assigned to two Committees – the Judiciary Committee and the Health & Government Operations Committee, given that the bill encompasses multiple sections of the Maryland code including Criminal Law, Public Safety, Courts, and Mental Health. At the beginning of the session when the bill was introduced, the Speaker appointed a bi-partisan work group composed of 6 members from each Committee. He has done this in the past on complex legislation. The work group spent many hours meeting with various groups interested in the legislation. In fact, over a four week period, the work group met at least 4 days a week for approximately 2 hours. We met with multiple members of law enforcement, including Chief Johnson from Baltimore County who serves on President Obama’s Commission on Gun Safety and Commissioner Batts from Baltimore City; mental health professionals; the Maryland Secretary of the Department of Mental Health & Hygiene, Dr. Sharfstein; the Maryland Gun Dealer’s Association; Marylanders to Prevent Gun Violence; the NRA; representatives of gun manufacturers; representatives of gun clubs; the MD Superintendent of Schools; and many others. We also had a presentation by Daniel Webster, the researcher from Johns Hopkins who edited the book “Reducing Gun Violence in America,” — which I’ve read; and reviewed other articles and research regarding what works in the area of preventing gun violence. The concept behind the work group is that there would be a critical mass on the committees with more than a working knowledge of the issues, law and statistics that the Governor’s legislation addresses.

The Committees then had the hearing on the bill on March 1. Over 1300 people came to Annapolis and signed up to testify. We made special accommodations to allow for sign up and to allow for the witnesses to listen to and watch the hearings in other rooms. The hearings started at noon on Friday, March 1 and ended at 3:45 am on Saturday morning March 2.

At this point in time, the House Committees are in the process of working through the bill and making decisions on a final product. It is correct that I recently said to a reporter that based on the research done by the work group and based on my experience on the Judiciary Committee over the past 10 years which includes listening to testimony and reviewing gun legislation and Maryland law, I have some doubt about whether a total “assault weapon ban” is necessary or effective in accomplishing the goal of preventing gun violence. However, no decisions have been made by the Committees and no specific weapons have been identified.

What is disconcerting, disappointing and frustrating is that the work group and the whole Committees have put in an incredible amount of hours and are still working on the bill. To be honest, the House bill will be stronger in many ways than what the Maryland Senate passed. But, before our work is finished — it’s criticized. And, what is worse, it’s criticized by individuals who clearly had no idea what the research on the effectiveness of assault weapons bans shows or the research on other aspects of gun control legislation; what the proposed legislation includes; or what the committee is considering. I wonder if anyone involved in the drafting of the Editorial even knew anything about Maryland’s existing laws regarding purchase of centerfire rifles — particularly how strict Maryland’s laws are compared to other States. I doubt anyone drafting the Editorial considered the number of deaths in Maryland from rifles compared to the number of deaths from handguns when determining what the legislation for MARYLAND should address. In fact, of the 398 deaths resulting from guns in Maryland in 2011, only 2 were from rifles – all of the others were from handguns. Clearly, that is where our focus needs to be.

The components of the legislation that I think will make a real difference in the lives of Maryland citizens are as follows: a limit on the size of the magazines to 10; enactment of a license to purchase process for handguns that includes fingerprinting – based on the empirical research conducted by Dr. Daniel Webster from Johns Hopkins University; strengthening the provisions of our law regarding who is prohibited from purchasing guns if they have had mental health issues; requiring training before the purchase of a handgun; strengthening the ability of law enforcement to review the records of gun dealers on a regular basis; prohibiting the sale of “cop killer bullets”; adding a provision to our laws regarding the reporting of lost and stolen guns; requiring individuals to register specific types of guns when they move to Maryland; and other provisions that are still being considered.

It is easy to jump on a National bandwagon and, no pun intended, take pot shots at legislators doing their jobs in order to advance a particular agenda. But, I really wish someone on the Post Editorial Board had investigated beyond this single, oversimplified issue of an “assault weapon ban.” Or, had even taken the time to understand the rest of the components of the pending legislation.

The House of Delegates is doing a comprehensive analysis and thorough vetting of the legislation. Instead of being commended for taking the time to be thoughtful and fair, we are being slammed for not rubber stamping the Governor’s agenda. I wonder what “special interest group” worked on getting the Post to run the editorial? Please note that the Committees may well decide that a complete ban is the right course for Maryland. We will deliberate this week. Whatever decision is made, it will not be made lightly and will be based on empirical data and research, and a great deal of soul-searching.

Best regards.


Comments are closed.